February 14 1932
Mlotkowski-Anderson 14 Feb 1932, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.comWe give below an instructive game played by Stasch Mlotkowski, of Philadelphia, last summer in a match with J. A. Anderson. Mlotkowski adopts the old-fashioned attack in the French Defense of 3. P-K5, a line of play that has been scrapped and then resurrected a number of times in the last fifty years. We give special attention to Mlotkowski's note (a) as well as his note (e).
Mlotkowski-Anderson 14 Feb 1932, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com
(a) This is better than B-Q3, because after PxP; 7. PxP B-Q2, White must play B-K2 and Black in reply to 6. B-K2 has nothing better than exchanging Pawns.
(b) If B-N5(ch); 8. N-B3 and now KN-K2 can be answered by either 9. O-O N-B4; 10. N-R4 or 9. P-QR3.
(c) Played in a similar position, except that Black's Queen's Bishop was at Q2 by Mackenzie against Burn. The usual move is P-QN3.
(d) It is doubtful if this is better than the usual course, P-KN3, followed by K-N2, but it relieves White of all anxiety regarding his Queen's Pawn.
(e) The attack here initiated does not yield anything; P-QN3 was an alternative.
(f) Or KR-Nsq first.
(g) Best, for if White is permitted to push Pawn to R6 and exchange Pawns and Rooks, Black's Bishop would have been of small use in the ending, with the White pieces being all on Black squares.
(h) This loses; B-Bsq should have drawn.
(i) If PxR, 35. R-Q7, K-Nsq; 36. P-K7 R-Bsq; 37. R-Q8.
Stasch Mlotkowski (white) vs. James Allan Anderson (black)
French Defense: Advance Variation, Paulsen Attack
December 14 1932
They Don't Speak Our Language 14 Dec 1932, Wed The Daily Times (Davenport, Iowa) Newspapers.com